home loan refinance, refinancing, mortgage, debt, restructing, consolidation, lower payments, dui lawyer, remortgage, loans, lower rates, reduce repayments, credit card rates, house loans, home loans, better finance, personal injury, borrowing, car loans, equity release, social lending, credit union

« Olympic Hero: Antoine Deneriaz | Main | St Valenshite »

A ban on smoking

Britain's lawmakers are voting on a smoking ban today. Smoking will not be banned of course, but it will be banned inside public places such as offices, shops, restaurants and bars.

There may or may not be exemptions for bars that don't serve food, and private members clubs.

I am not sure whether I support such a ban or not. Personally I would like smoking to be banned in all buildings and open spaces that I am ever likely to use. But much though I would like to mould the country around my own preferences, reality means accepting a majority view and also balancing personal liberty with public health.

I tend to err on the side of liberty but there are occasional episodes that turn me into an authoritarian, wanting to ban cigarettes completely. Like the colleague whose daughter smoked throughout pregnancy and when the baby was a few days overdue joked that the it didn't want to be born as it was addicted to nicotine.

But then people as vile as that will happily harm children some other way if cigarettes are denied them.

For two years I worked in a smoking office. It wasn't just an office that allowed smoking, it was an office where management chain-smoked. The office stank, the people stank; by lunchtime the smoke formed layers; there was ash on the every surface. And funnily enough the company had a really bad sickness record. Go figure.

Ultimately, with only a third of people smoking, and half of them wishing they could quit, a smoking ban is doing a lot of people a favour, so let's haul ass and get it in place.

Comments (2)

Donald:

very self righteous comments from somebody who has spent a portion of his life contaminating the environment himself!

nea:

There is no reason why people should be allowed to destroy other people's living environment -- it's not a question of freedom. I mean, seriously.

Of course that's easy for me to say, since my own life has become a lot better since smoking was banned from all public buildings, including (as of two years ago, I think) restaurants and bars. It's wonderful. I don't mind other people destroying their lives, it's up to them. But why should they have the right to destroy the lives of those around them?

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

About

This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on February 14, 2006 8:13 PM.

The previous post in this blog was Olympic Hero: Antoine Deneriaz.

The next post in this blog is St Valenshite.

Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.

Powered by Movable Type 4.1
Hosted by LivingDot
bad credit, repo, foreclosure, repossession, ccj, new kitchen, asset finance, leasing, cash back loans